The Production of Micro-Social Space in Residential Alleys
Operationalizing Lefebvre’s Theory through Place-Centered Mapping in Ampenan Old Town
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v15i3.687Keywords:
Production of space, micro social space, place-centered mapping, theory operationalization, Ampenan Old TownAbstract
The alleys in Ampenan Old Town function as both circulation routes and social spaces, shaped by residents' daily practices. However, research on kampung urban alleys remains largely descriptive and lacks a practical framework for systematically analyzing how space is produced. This study applies Henri Lefebvre’s theory of spatial production through a mapping approach centered on the core of place, within the context of organizational gangs. The method mapped activity nodes, time rhythms, conflicts between circulation and social interaction, and patterns of spatial negotiation in the alleys of RT 3, Dende Seleh Neighborhood, Ampenan Old Town. Results reveal two types of micro-social space production: first, a communal-temporal social space in Alleys 1, 3, 4, and 5 that operates according to afternoon-to-evening rhythms and is reinforced by collective momentum; second, a domestic social space—an extension of home in Alley 2—that is rooted in kinship ties and serves as an extension of the household.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Ramelan, S. Handayani, and Sukadi, “‘Gang’ Kampung Kota–Sarana Sirkulasi Multi Fungsi,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Eco Urban Design: Potensi dan Tantangan Perencanaan Kota-Kota Indonesia di Masa Mendatang, Semarang, Indonesia, Oct. 23, 2008.
[2] M. de Certeau, “Practices of space: The blind city,” in On Signs, M. Blonsky, Ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985, pp. 122–145.
[3] A. S. Lathif, “Living in alleys: A story of kampung kota,” in Perception, Design and Ecology of the Built Environment: A Focus on the Global South, M. Ghosh, Ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp. 487–502, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25879-5_21..
[4] J. Santoso, Menyiasati Kota Tanpa Warga. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2006.
[5] P. N. Krishartadi and N. S. Ristianti, “Adaptasi desain sirkulasi gang Kampung Sekayu Semarang sebagai ruang publik responsif pandemi COVID-19,” Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2022, doi: 10.31848/arcade.v6i3.1023.
[6] F. A. Muzady and T. K. Wibisono, “Kajian pemanfaatan jalan gang sebagai ruang belajar daring selama pandemi COVID-19 di Bintaran Kidul, Kota Yogyakarta,” in Prosiding SAKAPARI: Seminar Karya dan Pameran Arsitektur Indonesia, 2021, pp. 186–196.
[7] R. U. Noviantri, H. W. Wiranegara, and Y. Supriatna, “Jenis ruang publik di kampung kota dan sense of community warganya (Kasus: Kampung Kali Apuran, Jakarta Barat),” Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2019, doi: 10.14710/jpk.7.2.191-198.
[8] A. Prasetyo, “Peranan ruang komunal dalam mewadahi perilaku sosial masyarakat Kampung Ratmakan,” Langkau Betang: Jurnal Arsitektur, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2019, doi: 10.26418/lantang.v6i2.34393.
[9] M. F. Hastira, M. Alhamin, and A. Yunus, “Pendekatan sosio-spasial Lefebvre dalam kebijakan pemanfaatan ruang (Perda RTRW Kota Parepare),” NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2022, doi: 10.52423/neores.v4i1.18.
[10] W. Marliza, “Pemanfaatan Plaza Benteng Kuto Besak sebagai ruang publik di tepian Sungai Musi Kota Palembang,” Undergraduate thesis, Dept. Regional and Urban Planning, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2014.
[11] W. Firmansyah, “Triad conceptuals Henri Lefebvre dalam produksi ruang di Alun-Alun Malingping,” Indonesian Journal of Sociology, Education, and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.52483/ijsed.v6i1.95.
[12] F. Oktarina, “Shared space and culture of tolerance in kampung settlements in Jakarta,” Jurnal Sosioteknologi, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 416–423, 2018, doi: 10.5614/sostek.itbj.2018.17.3.9.
[13] D. B. H. Maela, S. S. Hadiwijoyo, and D. Purnomo, “Representasi ruang terbuka hijau kawasan sumber mata air Kali Benoyo dalam perspektif Henri Lefebvre,” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 30–48, 2022, doi: 10.20961/jas.v11i1.55747.
[14] P. N. G. Akbar and J. Edelenbos, “Social impacts of place-making in urban informal settlements: A case study of Indonesian kampungs,” Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, Art. no. 104, 2020, doi: 10.3390/socsci9060104.
[15] R. M. W. Ibadi, J. Roosandriantini, A. Hidayat, and N. Y. Lestari, “Teori Production of Space Henri Lefebvere dalam konteks untuk membaca ruang di Indonesia,” ARCHIMANE Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2025, doi: 10.59810/archimane.v3i2.175.
[16] A. Zieleniec, “Lefebvre’s politics of space: Planning the urban as oeuvre,” Urban Planning, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 5–15, 2018, doi: 10.17645/up.v3i3.1343.
[17] D. Hendra, “Analisis pemikiran Henri Levebvre tentang ruang dalam arsitektur modern: Suatu perspektif sosiologis,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 178–192, 2018, doi: 10.21009/jimd.v17i2.9092.
[18] R. M. W. Ibadi, “Dialektika teori The Production of Space,” ARCHIMANE Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 91–104, 2023, doi: 10.59810/archimane.v1i2.11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Liza Hani Saroya Wardi Wardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
