Adaptation and Flexibility of Residential Spatial Planning to the Functions of Home-Based Industries in Small Industrial Settlements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v15i1.552Keywords:
flexible housing design, home-based industry, small industrial settlements, spatial adaptation, spatial flexibilityAbstract
Small-Scale Industrial Settlements or Perkampungan Industri Kecil (PIK) are areas that have developed through the integration of residential and home-based industrial functions, giving rise to a need for adaptive and flexible spaces. The lack of responsive spatial planning in this context often leads to problems such as overcrowding, a decline in environmental quality, and conflicts of function between living and working areas. This study identifies patterns of spatial adaptation in accommodating home-based industrial activities, analyses factors influencing spatial flexibility, evaluates the impact of spatial transformation on residents’ well-being, and formulates flexibility-based design strategies. The research methodology employs a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative), utilizing field observation, interviews, and spatial analysis. The findings indicate that the separation of spatial functions (vertical, horizontal, or integrated) is influenced by the type of business, land area, and socio-economic conditions. Flexible housing designs have been shown to enhance production efficiency and living comfort. This study contributes by providing a flexible housing design model and recommendations for adaptive spatial planning policies for the PIK area.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Isra, H. H. Sakti, Y. Radhinal, and D. N. A. Ahmad, “Rekonstruksi ruang peri-urban: Interaksi sosial-ekonomi dalam dinamika kutub pertumbuhan dan proses gentrifikasi di kawasan perkotaan Bulukumba,” J. PeWeKa Tadulako, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–17, May 2025, doi: 10.22487/peweka.v4i1.47.
[2] D. Yasmin and F. Nilufar, “Adaptability in interior space: Public housing for lower-middle income group in Dhaka,” Interiority, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–136, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.7454/in.v6i1.251.
[3] Y. H. Wijaya and S. Supatra, “Perancangan hunian vertikal dengan fasilitas ‘industri kecil konveksi’ untuk mengurangi kepadatan penduduk di Kelurahan Jembatan Besi,” J. Sains Teknol. Urban Peranc. Arsit. (STUPA), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2245–2258, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.24912/stupa.v4i2.22141.
[4] P. Tutuko, “Perkembangan pola spasial kampung pada sentra usaha berbasis rumah tangga (UBR),” Mintakat J. Arsit., vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.26905/mintakat.v18i1.1414.
[5] A. Anisa, A. Ashadi, F. Lissimia, and R. F. Bimatukmaru, “Identifikasi adaptasi spasial pada hunian vernakular: Kasus studi rumah-rumah di Kota Lama Kudus,” NALARs, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 153–160, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.24853/nalars.22.2.153-160.
[6] A. J. Darmastuti, Y. Winarto, and H., “Penerapan fleksibilitas sebagai strategi desain perancangan kampung kota vertikal Kenteng Semanggi, Surakarta,” ARSITEKTURA, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 221–230, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.20961/arst.v17i2.24368.
[7] B. P. Ineru, S. Kusdiwanggo, and Y. A. Yusran, “Systematic literature review (SLR): Keberlanjutan arsitektur tradisional dan vernakular dalam menghadapi zaman pada konteks urban rural,” J. Lingkung. Binaan Indones., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 190–200, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.32315/jlbi.v13i4.408.
[8] R. Tarigan, “Tantangan pelestarian dan perubahan terhadap manfaat ruang tradisional akibat pengaruh kegiatan industri rumah tangga: Studi kasus rumah tinggal tradisional Kudus,” J. Arsit. KOMPOSISI, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 77–84, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.24002/jars.v11i2.1108.
[9] W. B. Nimpuno and R. M. Hasbi, “Hubungan antara kepribadian openness to experience terhadap adaptasi ruang bekerja di rumah,” Vitr. J. Arsit. Bangunan Lingkung., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 183–192, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.22441/vitruvian.2022.v11i2.009
[10] S. S. Permata, “Pengaruh industri sepatu dan sendal terhadap tipologi tata ruang rumah tinggal di Kelurahan Cikaret, Kecamatan Bogor Selatan, Kota Bogor,” Vitr. J. Arsit. Bangunan Lingkung., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 115–124, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.22441/vitruvian.2020.v9i2.006.
[11] N. J. Habraken, Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. London: Architectural Press, 1972.
[12] S. Brand, How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. London: Viking Press, 1994.
[13] R. Chairini, M. Widyasari, and D. N. Aulia, “Tipologi perumahan terencana berdasarkan kriteria layak huni,” J. Arsit. Perkotaan KORIDOR, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 2017.
[14] S. Asnur, S. Idris, and S. Mustafa, “Pola tata ruang rumah deret dan pengaruhnya terhadap optimasi penghawaan alami,” UNM Environ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2019.
[15] S. P. S. Putri and A. W. Purwantiasning, “Kajian konsep arsitektur modular pada rumah susun ITB Jatinangor,” Natl. Acad. J. Archit. (Nature), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 2021, doi: 10.24252/nature.v8i1a9
[16] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[17] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
[18] W. L. Neuman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suciati Permata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
